Saturday, August 8, 2009

Warkah Buat Sahabat-sahabat...

Assalamualaikum W.B.H

Lama rasanya tidak menulis, mencopet, dan menciplak idea-idea orang lain kat Internet ni. Namun jika perkara yang disebarkan itu adalah sesuatu yang positif dan bermanfaat..

Rasanya tidak salah pada hamba untuk berbuat sedemikian (biasanya hamba akan beri kredit dan linknya sekali untuk capaian terus). Ingat! Internet sebagai tempat atau medium penyebaran ilmu pengetahuan dan kebenaran! Bukannya wasilah buat menyebarkan sampah, fitnah dan cerita-cerita palsu!

Ianya juga menjadi tempat sesetengah hamba Allah mencurahkan isi hati dan keluhan, tempat meringan beban jiwa yang terpaksa ditanggung akibat menahan lidah dari melampiaskan isi hati yang bernanah-nanah...

Dan juga bagi sesetengah orang tempat melepaskan segala kemarahan mereka, melayan nafsu dan ego ‘keakuan’ yang ditahan-tahan di alam nyata(mungkin?)

...dan yang penting, ‘suara’ dan ‘platform bagi segelintir mustadhoifin (memetik kata saudara Faisal Tehrani) menyuarakan penderitaan mereka..

...dan buat hamba.. satu sudut sunyi untuk berkarya...

Yah! Itulah internet!

Berjuang atas kebenaran demi kebenaran..

Coretan kali ini ingin hamba tujukan istemewanya buat tuan-tuan, dengan harapan, bila ada masa nak menjenguk ke alam siber ini.. setidak-tidak pun.. kalau-kalau tuan terserempak atau tersesat ke mari.. setidak-tidaknya..

..ada la sesuatu benda yang boleh dibaca..

Hamba ingin mencuri tumpuan tuan-tuan semua untuk meneliti sebentar pada artikel ini, yang hamba ‘tersandung’ di http://chedet.co.cc/chedetblog/2009/08/budaya-anwar.html#more, hasil nukilan Prabagaran Gopalakrishnan, seorang pengujung di laman Tun Dr. Mahathir.. mari kita lupakan sebentar hal politik datuk-datuk sekelian (ehem!)..

Prabagaran GopalakrishnanAuthor Profile Page

Dear Tun
Good Evening Tun!

A friend sent me the below article via e-mail. Tun, do have any comment on it.

Thank You
Prabagaran

The Great Malaysian Brain Drain

There's a boy I know who scored 10 A1s. His mother is a primary school teacher and Andrew has two younger brothers. His father, a civil servant, had already passed on by the time the son sat SPM in 2006.


Armed with his excellent result, Andrew applied for a scholarship to study mechanical engineering. The government rejected his application. Petronas rejected his application too. Can you imagine how disappointed and frustrated he was?


As soon as I learned of Andrew's difficulty, I offered him financial assistance to do accountancy in Utar. He has been scoring top marks in every exam to earn a scholarship from the university. Although Andrew is now exempted from paying fees, I still bank him RM400 a month to cover cost of living.


I have given assistance and allowances to more than 40 poor students to study in Utar in Kampar, Perak. Andrew is typical of their calibre; he prefers to get what is his due on merit, and his university has deservingly waived his fees.


On my part, I expect nothing from those that I've supported except for them in future to help young people in similar circumstances, and to hope that they will all stay back in Malaysia so that they can lend their talents to building up our nation.


Asean (mainly Malaysian!) Scholarships: Our Brains, Their Gain
There are others that have deeper pockets who have extended a helping hand to our youngsters. One of them offers the cost of school and exam fees, hostel accommodation, RM5,800 a year for expenses, RM1,200 settling-in allowance, and transport/air ticket. Furthermore, the recipient is not bonded. Or in other words, the giver asks for nothing back.
I'm talking about the pre-university Asean scholarship extended to Malaysians by 'the little red dot' Singapore.


Of course, Singapore is not doing it for purely altruistic reasons. The country is giving these much coveted Asean scholarships to build up her national bank of talent. Some Malaysians accuse them of 'poaching' the creme de la creme of our youngsters. I don’t look at it as poaching. Their far-sighted government is doing it in their national interest.


And why not? Singapore can afford it. It has three times our GDP per capita. On another comparative note, the GDP per capita of Taiwan and South Korea are 2.5 times and double ours respectively. Before the NEP's introduction in 1970, the four countries were at parity.
The big question is why are we surrendering our assets which Malaysian parents have nurtured but the state neglected?


Tens of thousands of young Malaysians have left our shores on the Asean scholarship. I am not sure if Singapore is willing to give out the figure. But I am pretty sure the Malaysian Authorities do not give two hoots about this, whatever number they may have arrived at. If they have, there seems to be no policy change to stem the outflow.


Malaysia is being too optimistic and misguided about the continuous brain drain, little caring that it is detrimental to our aspiration of becoming a developed country (I hate to say this) like Singapore.


Behaving Like a Failed State
Consider this startling statistic: There are more Sierra Leonean doctors working in hospitals in the city of Chicago than in their own homeland. More Malawian nurses in Manchester than in Malawi. Africa's most significant export to Europe and the United States is trained professionals, not petroleum, gold and diamond.


The educated African migration is definitely retarding the progress of every country in Africa. Today, one in three African university graduates, and 50,000 doctoral holders now live and work outside Africa. Sixty-four percent of Nigerians in the USA has one or more university degrees.
If we carry out a study, we are likely to find a very large number of non-Malay graduates emigrating to Singapore, Australia and other countries that is proportionately similar to the African exodus. However the compulsion is different, seeing as how some African countries are war-torn and famished which is certainly not the case. The push factors for our own brain drain lie in NEP policy and this needs to be addressed with urgency
State Ideology: Be Grateful You Are Malaysian


Try putting yourself in the shoes of an 18-year-old. This young Malaysian born in 1991 is told that Umno was very generous in granting citizenship to his non-Malay forefathers in 1957. Thus as a descendant of an immigrant community – one should be forever grateful and respect the 'social contract'.


Gratitude is demanded by the state while little is reciprocated. Under the NEP – and some say this policy represents the de facto social contract – every single Vice Chancellor of every single Malaysian public university is Malay. Promotion prospects for non-Malay lecturers to full professorship or head of department are very dim, hence we have the dichotomy of non-Malays predominant in private colleges while correspondingly, the academic staff of public institutions proliferate with Malays.


The civil service is staffed predominantly by Malays too, and overwhelmingly in the top echelons. The government-linked corporations have been turned into a single race monopoly. Hence is it any surprise that almost all the scholarships offered by government and GLCs seem to be reserved for Malays?


Youngsters from the minority communities see that Malays are the chosen ones regardless of their scholastic achievement and financial position. Some are offered to do a Master even though they did not even apply (but the quota is there to be filled, so these disinterested Malays are approached).


Our lesson today is ...
How the government apparatus conducts itself and the consequences of its policy implementation will upset an individual's innate sense of justice.


The government pays about RM1.8 billion in annual salaries to teachers. A child is taught moral studies in class but he learns in life that adults condone and conspire to immorality by perpetuating the unfairness and injustice which impacts on Malaysia's young.


On the other hand, the favoured group is given more than their just desserts without either merit or need. When one is bred to think that privilege is only his rightful entitlement, we would not expect this young person to pay back to society in return.


Our Malaysian education system has been flip-flopped, pushed and pulled this way and that until standards dropped to alarming levels. The passing mark for subjects in public exams have fallen notoriously low while the increasing number of distinctions have risen fatuously high with SPM students notching 14As, 17As and 21As.


With top scorers aplenty, there will not be enough scholarships to go around now that the Education Ministry has decided to put a cap on the SPM, limiting takers to 10 subjects.


The Human Factor
It's unrealistic that the education system can be effectively overhauled. Even tweaking one aspect of it, such as the language switch for Math and English, created havoc. It's not that our educational framework is so bad as after all, a lot of study and planning did go into it. It's only when the politicians dictate from on high and overrule the better judgment of the educationists – Dr Mahathir Mohamad being case in point – that we slide deeper into the doldrums.
The politicization of education and the hijacking of the country’s educational agenda has clearly cost us heavily in terms of policy flip flops and plummeting standards, and the loss of a good part of our young and talented human resources.


Matters become worse when Little Napoleons too take it upon themselves to interfere with teachers. For instance, the serial number assigned candidates when they sit public exams. Why is a student's race encoded in the number? What does his ethnicity have to do with his answer script?


There is further suspicion that the stacks of SPM papers are not distributed to examiners entirely at random (meaning ideally examiners should be blind to which exam centres the scripts they're marking have originated from).


A longstanding complaint from lecturers is that they are pressured to pass undergrads who are not up to the mark, and having to put up with mediocre ones who believe they are 'A' material after being spoilt in mono-racial schools.


Letting teachers do their job properly and allowing them to grade their students honestly would arrest the steep erosion of standards. And unless we are willing to be honest brokers in seeking a compromise and adjustment, the renewed demonizing of vernacular schools is merely mischievous. Either accept their existence or integrate the various types of schools.


But are UiTM and its many branch campuses throughout the length and breadth of the country, Mara Junior Science Colleges and the residential schools willing to open their doors to all on the basis of meritocracy if Chinese, Tamil, and not forgetting religious schools, were abolished? Not open to a token few non-Bumiputera but genuinely open up and with the admission numbers posted in a transparent manner.


Finally, there are teachers genuinely passionate about their profession. There are promising teachers fresh out of training college who are creative and capable of inspiring their students. It's not only Form 5 students who have been demoralized. Teachers are human capital that we seem to have overlooked in the present controversy.


Conclusion: Ensuring Fairness For the Future Well Being of Our Young
A segment of Johoreans cross the Causeway daily to attend school in Singapore. Many continue their tertiary education in Singapore which has among the top universities in the world. Eventually, they work in Singapore and benefit Singapore.


Ask around among your friends and see who hasn't got a child or a sibling who is now living abroad as a permanent resident. I can't really blame them for packing up and packing it in, can you? It's simply critical now that we don't let our kids lose hope and throw in the towel. The system might be slower to reform but mindsets at least can be changed easier.


It starts with the teachers, the educationists and the people running the education departments and implementing the policies. Please help Malaysian youngsters realise their full potential. Just try a little fairness first.

Personal Note:
Readers may be interested to know that the author have four children all of whom are accomplished in their respective fields. Three of them are part of the brain drain and have chosen to settle down abroad; only one is back in Malaysia.
My son who has double degrees in civil engineering and chartered accountancy is an investor in Canada. He could be here to create hundreds of jobs to enrich Malaysia but he has been so disgusted with our policies and their implementation that he has chosen not to return. I am sure that there are tens, if not hundreds of thousands of similar young Malaysians that our country has lost, no thanks to our short-sighted educational policies. And yet the Government is so keen to attract foreign investors. Where is the logic and rationality?

Bagi pengunjung lain yang ‘kurang faham’ tentang isi coretan saudara Prabagaran Gopalakrishnan, hamba berikan intipati tulisan beliau:

“kita semakin kehilangan bakat–bakat dan generasi bijak pandai muda (bukan Melayu) yang berhijrah ke luar negara yang kecewa akibat tiada peluang dan pengiktirafan disebabkan polisi-polisi kita yang kurang efektif..”

Siapakah yang untung besar dalam hal ini?

Republik Singapura

Walaupun penulis ini adalah bangsa “bukan Melayu” yang sentiasa mencari salah “pentadbir-pentadbir Melayu”, itu salah, itu tak kena, namun coretannya ini ada kebenarannya walau sekelumit...

..yang sekelumit itulah kita nak ambil buat pengajaran tuan-tuan semua!

..yang sampah kita campak dalam tong sampah!

Singapura mendapat pulangan dan untung besar dalama pelaburannya melalui The Pre-University Asean Scholarship (Biasiswa Pra-Universiti Asean) yang di buka kepada semua bangsa dan warganegara Asean. Tujuan?

Untuk menarik ramai bijak pandai ke Temasik demi buat menaikkan negeri setelah ‘dipancing’ dengan budi!

Umum mengetahui yang kebanyakan graduan kita (Melayu la...) paling ramai berhutang dengan PTPTN atau biasiswa KPM, nak biaya sendiri tak mampu, mak bapak kat kampung pun makan ikan kering semata.

Mereka yang keluar ni biasanya keluar makan gaji dengan swasta atau kerajaan. Mana yang cari rezeki halal tu, memang tak ke mana la, yang ‘cerdik’ sikit, jadi balaci pengampu orang atasan yang ‘bodoh-bodoh sikit’ tapi nasibnya baik dan bermulut manis dan bermuka baik laksana susu sejat F&N atau Dutch Lady...

Itu yang Melayunya...

Yang Cina & Indianya...

PTPTN atau biasiswa KPM tiada dalam kamus hidup mereka...

Biasanya, mereka akan disapport oleh Uncle-uncle atau kawan ayah yang ‘senang sikit’ dan ‘celik akalnya’ kerana mereka sedar mereka tidak akan dilayan dengan ‘selesa’ dalam kerajaan yang ‘didominasi’ oleh...

Dan bila peluang ni dibuka ‘seluas-luasnya’ depan mata; memang menyambarlah mereka lagaknya ibarat ikan toman jumpa cicak!

Bukan macam budak-budak kita, semua berebut-rebut nak jadi Raja Lawak, atau artis realiti yang tak ke mana pun!

...dan oleh sebab itu:

Mereka tidak bergantung harap pada ... dan bila mereka dapat degree, jangan harap mereka akan balik ke sini lagi kerana $$$ yang dihasilkan dinilai dalam USD atau Pound Sterling!

Jadi.. jangan kita nak kuliah atau bagi kesedaran kat mereka, bangga jadi ... atau sebagainya kerana mereka:

Memang tiada kesetiaan sejak dari awal lagi...

Baik.. kita berbalik pada persoalan asas..

Bila bijak pandai (Cina dan India) ni dah tak ada, maka akan kuranglah golongan bijak pandai ni di Malaysia, bila golongan ni kurang (bukan tak ada, sapa kata yang Melayu tak pandai? Yang 20 A tu siapa?) maka negara kita ini akan kurang kompetetif berbanding negara di Hujung Tanah tu.. lebih-lebih lagi jika kita bandingkan nisbah perkadaran rakyat dengan kawasan tanah, dan nisbah perkadaran rakyat yang kurang bijak dengan rakyat yang bijak pandai! Bila kurang bijak pandai, pelabur kurang masuk disebabkan pelbagai faktor.. dsbnya, dsbnya, dsbnya....

Faham?

(Halim Fansuri - 08 Ogos 2009/17 Syaaban 1430H / 2118H)

P/s: ...golongan muda, tak kira apa bangsa pun inginkan pengiktirafan. Budaya Melayu mengajar sopan-santun bila buka bicara, namun yang tua-tua (keladi) nampak gayanya suka membisukan mereka dan memekakkan telinga...

No comments:

Berwajah Harimau Berhati Singa!

Berwajah Harimau Berhati Singa!

Sebelum Kau Pergi...

Saidina Ali ada memberi petunjuk dan peninggalan untuk mereka yang mahu mengikut dan menjejakinya. Bunyi pedoman itu dapat dikutip dalam Nahjul Balaghah, begini:

'La tastawhisyu fi thariqilhuda liqillati ahlih. Fainnan nasa qad ijtama'u ala maidah syiba'uha qashir wa ju'uha thawil.'

Maksudnya: 'Janganlah kamu merasa kesepian di jalan petunjuk kerana sedikit pengikutnya. Manusia sungguh hanya berkumpul di sekitar hidangan. Kenyangnya sebentar, laparnya berpanjangan.'

Jadi, biaq pi lah orang pergi kepada dia. Kita mesti kekal jadi minoriti yang berpegang kepada kebenaran. – Faisal Tehrani

*Catatan tambahan: Sey amat meminati gaya penulisan FT, tapi bukan bawaan akidahnya. Sey ASWJ Mazhab Imam Syafiee dgn Kaedah Tauhid Asyairah wal Maturidiyyah. Pandangan ulama Sunni terhadap kitab Nahjul Balaghah (kumpulan khutbah, surat, dan kata-kata hikmat yang dinisbatkan kepada Sayyidina 'Ali bin Abi Thalib R.A.) adalah campuran antara pengakuan akan keindahan sasteranya dan kritikan terhadap kesahihan riwayatnya.Berikut adalah ringkasan pandangan Sunni terhadap kitab tersebut:1. Pengakuan terhadap Keindahan Sastera. Majoriti ulama Sunni mengakui bahawa Nahjul Balaghah adalah karya sastera Arab yang sangat tinggi nilainya. Muhammad Abduh(Tokoh Kaum Muda), bahkan pernah membuat syarah (penjelasan) ke atas kitab ini kerana kagum dengan balaghah (kefasihan) bahasa yang terkandung di dalamnya.2. Kritikan terhadap Kesahihan Riwayat - Walaupun dihormati dari segi sastera, ulama hadis Sunni umumnya berhati-hati dengan kandungan Nahjul Balaghah kerana:Tiada Sanad: Kitab ini dihimpunkan oleh Sharif Radhi pada kurun ke-4 Hijrah, jauh selepas kewafatan Sayyidina 'Ali R.A. (kurun ke-1 Hijrah). Kebanyakan khutbah di dalamnya tidak disertakan dengan sanad (rangkaian perawi) yang bersambung. Isu Kandungan: Sebahagian kandungan dianggap bertentangan dengan riwayat sejarah yang lebih sahih atau mengandungi cercaan terhadap para sahabat Nabi yang lain, yang mana ia diragui keluar daripada lidah Saidina 'Ali R.A..3. Sikap terhadap Isi Kandungan Bukan Sumber Utama: Dalam tradisi ilmu Sunni, Nahjul Balaghah tidak dianggap sebagai kitab rujukan hadis utama atau sahih seperti Sahih Bukhari atau Sahih Muslim. Boleh Diterima Sebahagian: Kata-kata hikmat atau nasihat yang tidak bertentangan dengan akidah dan sejarah Ahli Sunnah boleh diterima sebagai mutiara kata, namun tidak boleh dijadikan hujah hukum (dalil syarak) secara mutlak.Kesimpulannya, Sunni menghargai Nahjul Balaghah sebagai karya sastera yang hebat, tetapi tidak mengiktiraf seluruh isinya sebagai riwayat sahih daripada Saidina 'Ali R.A.Nota: Pandangan ini disimpulkan berdasarkan rujukan umum ilmu hadis dan ulasan ulama Sunni terhadap kitab tersebut.